Description
Leaves are different from roots. Leaves give the sense of springy, green, sparse, branching, fruit or flowers, while roots or bases give more of an impression of depth and originality, of old guard, of searching for the source of water, of history and foundation. As for what is under the title, the three words: “Philosophy, confusions, balance” is a reference to a departure from the topic, especially the word philosophy. For those who have not read sociology, the book is an introduction to the science and a catalyst to expand on it, and it will add a kind of sociological sense, but if you are familiar with sociology, I expect you to find great philosophical depth in the book
The first part of the book is on philosophy and has several chapters: It explains the concept of goodness and its origin in one chapter, then in another chapter the book talks about the illusion of individuality, in the third chapter about the family as the building block of society and realism, in the fourth about the surrounding environment and its impact, and in the fifth about the supernatural and the impact of philosophy on societies, all in an easy and non-scholastic style. The second part talks about the most prominent distractions or obstacles that harm society, each distraction in a chapter, as follows: Racism, procrastination, revenge and revenge: Racism, procrastination, revenge, pornography, esotericism, mixing politics and religion, the king's dilemma, capitalism and hegemony, Google as an example, and the philosophy of evil. The third chapter, titled Equilibrium, talks generally about marginalized people such as the insane and addicts and the need to contain them, the intellectual impact of quantum physics on the social sciences and the principle of uncertainty, and the illusion of control and its replacement by ecological balance.
I would like to point out that the book contains a lot of quotations and quotes from the previous book by the same author: “The 40 Rules of Madness.” If you've read that book, you probably don't need to read this one unless you liked it so much that you intend to re-read it, or if you have a strong passion for sociology.
